Participate

Tell us about an AI path that began with a real problem.

We are looking for observations, scenes, and details from everyday life: small businesses, schools, care, agriculture, counselling, culture, public administration, workshops, families, or clubs. It does not need to be a finished success story. Often the first failed attempt is the best entry point.

Send a suggestion What we include

Contact with characters from the series is not possible because they are fictional composite figures. The editorial team can be reached through the form.

§ 01 · Who can get in touch

A precise observation matters more than a finished technical résumé.

You can write to us if you have seen an everyday experience in an AI project that would otherwise be easy to miss. It might be a teacher rethinking homework. A care worker who finds an alert system too loud. A craftsperson who distrusts a sensor model because the machine sounds different. A translator who notices that an automatic formulation seems polite and still lands wrongly.

We are especially interested in perspectives that do not begin with a finished technical résumé. Age, education, industry, and formal status matter less to us than a precise observation: What was the problem? Where did AI help? Where did it become delicate? Who had to take responsibility in the end?

§ 02 · What makes a good suggestion

A concrete scene beats a general claim.

Good suggestions include a concrete scene. Not: «AI in care is interesting.» Better: «During handover, a risk alert was missed because it appeared in the wrong system window.» Not: «Generative images are changing design.» Better: «An image model produced a beautiful pattern, but the repeat broke on fabric.»

Small cases count, too. A checklist that prepares a counselling conversation. A learning bot that does not shame the learner. A dashboard that makes uncertainty visible. A translation workflow that finds cultural mistakes earlier. We take such observations seriously because they show how AI is actually tested in use.

§ 03 · What we are not looking for

No tool advertising, no hero stories, no real names.

We are not looking for tool advertising, product demos, or finished hero stories. We do not take real names of public AI figures and turn them into characters, and we do not build portraits from verifiable private details. Links to personal profiles, channels, or company pages are not needed for the portraits either.

When you write to us, describe the situation rather than the brand of the tool. We do not need large numbers or market claims. One precise observation from a shift, a counselling session, a course, or a workshop is more valuable than a general promise.

The editorial team reads each note before replying. Concrete scenes land better than general claims — a handover, a form, a workshop, a conversation that went sideways.

How to reach you

Your name So we can address you by name. Email address The editorial team will reply to this address. Other contact channel (optional) Signal, Telegram, postal address — leave blank if email is enough.

About the observation

Location / regionOptional — helps us place the scene geographically without identifying a real person.What field does the observation come from?What happened?Describe a concrete scene. What was the problem? What role did AI play? What went wrong or became better? At least 60 characters.What should remain anonymous?Optional. Do not include confidential data. Write here which details must not be used.

Editorial consentI understand that my note will not become a real biography, but at most a fictional composite story.

A good story often begins with a small disturbance.

A form is hard to understand. A model is too certain. A recommendation does not fit the shift. A tool saves time but moves responsibility. Observations like these are the material of the series.

Send a suggestion Back to the homepage